I know everyone has one but, as is the spirit of this blog, that is no reason why I should.
The null option is to do nothing ie not have a blogroll at all. It is not as if I don’t mention all sorts of people as it is. And I think recommending an individual post is a much better way of giving someone a plug than a mention on a blogroll. However, there are also blogs I read every day which I tend not to link to - on the grounds that they don’t need a little imp like me promoting them ie Instapundit and Samizdata. I ought to at least give them a nod.
The only other real argument that I can think of is to have a handy list of links for my own benefit. But I already have that at Bloglines. You can see my list here. The drawback is that there is a hard core of RSS refuseniks who I can’t read that way. No, I have to log onto their sites on the off chance that they’ve published an update. It is so 2003. But still, I need the list. But I feel that if I mention them then form demands that I mention everyone else. Now, there is a potential solution here and it relies on a clever piece of code from those nice people at Bloglines. What it allows me to do is to automatically list all those thoughtful people who have provided a feed and then, at the end, the recusants.
But where should I put this list? Most people put their blogroll up on the sidebar. But I think at this rate it is going to get a bit clogged. What I think I am going to do is to create a separate page - possibly even post and then link to it from the sidebar.
That only leaves one outstanding gripe. I don’t like bald lists - especially long, bald lists. They give you very little idea what to read. My idea was to create a new post for every new blog with a little description and then, by the magic of categorisation, create a blogroll automatically. Sadly, what with all my existing Bloglines listings this isn’t really feasible - we’d be here until Christmas. Pity. Who knows, maybe Bloglines will set that up. After all, they’ve set up pretty much everything else.